In our society of more, brands are as addicting as crack.

June 14, 2010

Remind you of anything?

In between normal books, I am reading Bill Clegg’s Portrait of an Addict as a Young Man. Clegg was a promising young talent in the New York publishing world. He was also a crack addict, who hit, in the parlance of recovery, a very “low bottom.” He’d reached the “jumping off point,” where one can no longer imagine life with drugs or without them.

It’s not that Clegg’s book is badly written or uninformed it’s just that I’ve heard/read/seen it all before. I know the subject matter. Regardless of the drug of choice (crack, heroin, booze, pot, pills, coke, etc.), addicts are all hopelessly and painfully alike. They cannot stop doing something that will send them to a hospital, prison or the cemetery, not necessarily in that order. There’s more to it than that but, frankly, not much.

These stories are as predictable as they are blunt. First the addict recounts (in harrowing detail) his or her mind-numbing, soul-crushing descent into hell. Then there’s rehab, where we usually get a pain-filled description of withdrawal and afterward the melodramatic tale of the addict coming back to life. Unfortunately, this is usually followed by relapse. God knows why, the addict throws away his new lease on life and goes back to a place even worse than before. Finally, he and we get our reprieve, at least for the time being…enough time to write the memoir. The addict is saved and tries to stay saved, “one day at a time.”

I’ve read dozens of these memoirs and will probably read two or three a year for the rest of my life. Why? Let’s just say I need the reminders. Yet, personal reasons aside, I have a professional curiosity about addiction.

After all, is not addiction the secret fantasy of every client: that their products, brands or services become an integral part of as many people’s lives as possible? And by integral I mean critical and indispensable. The end user simply cannot or will not imagine his or her life without it…whatever it is.

A senior-most planner once told me that in order to change consumer behavior advertisers must establish, what he coined, “the routinization of belief.” I don’t know. Sounds damn close to the definition of addiction to me. I mean if you truly believe you can’t live without something you’re likely addicted to it. While this seems obvious when it comes to beer, wine and spirits the argument holds up elsewhere, too. People are addicted to coffee, cell phones, fast food, computers, chocolate, fashion, TV shows, social networks, sex, other people, diets, working out and countless other things savory and not. And all of it comes nicely packaged as brands (Starbucks), products (Ipad) and services (Equinox), which, in turn, become drugs of choice.

In this metaphor advertising is obviously the dealer. The product is always new and improved, better than before, life changing. If an ad can’t talk you into using, he’ll let you have a taste: buy one get one free, 50% off, one day only. Whatever it takes to get you hooked. “We make you want what you don’t need,” reads the headline on this blog, until, perhaps, you do need it.

Follow me on Twitter

Submit to the Rogue\'s Gallery!

My novel on Amazon!


6 Responses to “In our society of more, brands are as addicting as crack.”

  1. Madison said

    I would argue that it is BRANDS that are in a role of dealers in majority of situations. Look at McDonalds or Starbucks that, like drug dealers, occupy almost every corner; counting on our Pavlovian reaction to their siren call of behavior triggering logos…

  2. SRP said

    I supposed I pushed (so to speak) the ads as dealer metaphor a bit hard. One could easily argue that brands are the pushers.
    Thank you for coming back to Gods of Advertising.

  3. Troy said

    Agencies aren’t the dealers, they’re the crack whores who will blow a dealer (the brand/client) for $10 in an underpass. Look at the agency addiction to awards. Look at Leo Burnetts ‘david on demand’–what is that but the ultimate addict crack whore?

    • SRP said

      Harsh comment but it was my metaphor that spurned it! As for “David on Demand” I’m not sure what to make of that. Your POV on the matter certainly has been a popular one. I think the idea is good but making it (and him) all about the party probably a bad move. Why can’t David talk about visiting the work and some of its creators? That would have at least positioned it/him in a better light. Yes?

  4. Madison said

    How about a brand being a whore with an agency pimping it to all potential clients (aka customers)?

    This theory can get more complex as you go through actual examples; e.g. Apple is a teasing little minx; with its outfits (packaging/design) as appealing as the actual content inside. Steve Jobs’ pimping is, of course, famous worldwide and has been actually captured on tape numerous times to be used as a paragon of presentation/pitch excellence. Pimp hat, the black turtleneck – it’s all the same in the end…

  5. @scottrcrawford said

    Is there a light at the end of this tunnel?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: